Ok, I think you know where I am going with this. For starters, Ann Coulter has a lot of haters out there, and I’m probably one of them. The biggest thing I despise about her is that she comes off as if she knows she’s right about everything, and that kind of attitude is disrespectful, and rude, so if people hate her, that’s her own damn fault.
But she appears to be okay with that, because she still acts like a moron, in spite of the fact her attitude, is probably causing most of her problems.
Second, I’m sick of the argument that “the left is just as whacked up as the right is, so it evens out.” That’s the stupidest thing I have ever heard. Not because I think it’s incorrect, but because people ALWAYS choose sides. My dad defends his undying loyalty to the Fox News Network by saying MSNBC is just as bad, only they are in favor of the left. Of course, this doesn’t stop him from watching Fox, nor does it seem to cause him to tune into MSNBC to prove this point, and (heaven forbid) provide a balanced amount of information.
But, bigger then all of this, is the fact that Republicans think they are king shit and that everyone is out to get them. Think about that. They think they are king shit, and everyone is out to get them. How the hell are those two things possible at the same time? The way I see it, if you are a supporter of the Fox News Party (I mean Republican Party), why do you feel threatened by anyone else? Also, why do Fox’ viewers need to be told about all the ratings Fox gets? Are people that insecure that they only want to watch what gets the most ratings? Is THAT what matters to people? That other people watch this shit too?
Anyway, getting back to this video, it’s kind of difficult to see just how insecure Ann Coulter’s is with her political views. I mean, how serious can you be when your argument is “they pulled it from the bill! It must be true! Death panels are real!”
What did Sarah Palin even mean by “death panels” anyway? I mean if a group of people gather to discuss anything, I guess it could be described as a “panel.” And if they are talking about death, then I guess that’s a “death panel.” But something as simple as calling a group of people discussing the topic of death a “death panel” shouldn’t cause any headlines.
So let’s look at what Sarah Palin actually said:
“The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s ‘death panel’ so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their ‘level of productivity in society,’ whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil.”
Umm, what?
“Bureaucrat: an official who works by fixed routine without exercising intelligent judgment.” (that sounds like Sarah Palin to me!!! 
)
So let’s see if I can translate this well enough: she’s saying that Obama has (or is proposing to have) his own panel that will discuss the topic of death comprised of officials who work by a fixed routine without exercising intelligent judgment to decide if certain individuals have a high enough ‘level of productivity in society,’ and therefore, deserve health care (aka deserve to live).
I think that was a pretty accurate assessment of what she was trying to say, right?
So let’s see if there is any evidence to support this claim (other then the insanely stupid “they pulled it from the bill, it must be true!” argument)
Oh, you mean, there is nothing in the bill that determines ANYTHING regarding when to kill patients? I mean nothing? You can prove nothing exists right? Oh I forgot, it’s kind of hard to prove nothing is there.
Anyway here is what got Palin in such a bad mood. Feel free to read it yourself. But I don’t see anything in there that dictates that anyone has control over when to give up trying to save someone, other the person who the decision is to be made for. Personally I think this is a GREAT thing. I don’t think this is a neutral thing, and certainly not a bad thing, or an ‘evil’ thing.
Considering words like “beneficial” are being thrown around seems to lead me to believe this is a good thing. I mean, making a living will is not a bad thing. If I want them to do everything they can to save me, then BY LAW they are required to do everything they can to save me!
Now, if I make a living will that says they shouldn’t do anything other then X, Y, and Z, then they ought to follow that as well. The real issue as far as I can tell is whether or not the choice is removed from the person whose life is hanging in the balance. And this is not happening.
So, case closed.
Now, as far as Sarah Palin being so popular, well there’s not much I can say about that. But Sarah Palin’s tweet didn’t get all the attention it did because all the democrats are reading her Twitter account, it’s because all the republicans are talking about it.
Just another delusional argument where she thinks “everyone is talking about it! That means they like me!” As if.
Oh yeah, is it just me or does Ann Coulter hackle like a witch?
